<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lima’s Reclaimed Amusement Park</title>
	<atom:link href="http://1800recycling.com/2010/03/lima-reclaimed-amusement-park/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://1800recycling.com/2010/03/lima-reclaimed-amusement-park/</link>
	<description>Green is Good.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:26:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://1800recycling.com/2010/03/lima-reclaimed-amusement-park/comment-page-1/#comment-7762</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1800recycling.com/?p=3242#comment-7762</guid>
		<description>Hi, I live right out the front of the &quot;Ghost Train Park&quot; and I do agree it looked a lot nicer and was a bit of a facelift in comparison to much of the street in the area. However, I disagree with the comment of...
     &quot;Kids get a safe place to play&quot;

   The &quot;playground&quot; was essentially just a jury-rigging of tyres and ropes to create tyre swings and a &quot;tyre swing-horse&quot; with some propaganda posters of Basurama splashed around. The swings were quite sturdy (I had a play at about 2 am one night) and generally they were used with a modicum of adult supervision. But, the playground is located in the middle of a main arterial road from one of the tourist areas of Lima (basically a medium strip of grass), and hence it receives a large amount of traffic. There were no barriers set up so it was highly likely that some overexcited kids may spill out onto the causeway. Also, I do question the wisdom of seting up a &quot;kids attraction site&quot; where they have to cross up to 2 lanes of traffic. And in a city with a population near 8 million, and adding the factor of some loose regulating of traffic laws in the country, the term &quot;a safe place to play&quot; doesn´t sound fitting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I live right out the front of the &#8220;Ghost Train Park&#8221; and I do agree it looked a lot nicer and was a bit of a facelift in comparison to much of the street in the area. However, I disagree with the comment of&#8230;<br />
     &#8220;Kids get a safe place to play&#8221;</p>
<p>   The &#8220;playground&#8221; was essentially just a jury-rigging of tyres and ropes to create tyre swings and a &#8220;tyre swing-horse&#8221; with some propaganda posters of Basurama splashed around. The swings were quite sturdy (I had a play at about 2 am one night) and generally they were used with a modicum of adult supervision. But, the playground is located in the middle of a main arterial road from one of the tourist areas of Lima (basically a medium strip of grass), and hence it receives a large amount of traffic. There were no barriers set up so it was highly likely that some overexcited kids may spill out onto the causeway. Also, I do question the wisdom of seting up a &#8220;kids attraction site&#8221; where they have to cross up to 2 lanes of traffic. And in a city with a population near 8 million, and adding the factor of some loose regulating of traffic laws in the country, the term &#8220;a safe place to play&#8221; doesn´t sound fitting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

